首页> 外文OA文献 >Olfactory processing and odor specificity: a meta-analysis of menstrual cycle variation in olfactory sensitivity
【2h】

Olfactory processing and odor specificity: a meta-analysis of menstrual cycle variation in olfactory sensitivity

机译:嗅觉处理和气味特异性:月经周期嗅觉敏感性的荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Cycle-correlated variation in olfactory threshold, with women becoming more sensitive to odors mid-cycle, is somewhat supported by the literature but the evidence is not entirely consistent, with several studies finding no, or mixed, effects. It has been argued that cyclic shifts in olfactory threshold might be limited to odors relevant to the mating context. We aimed to test whether the evidence currently available points in the direction of odor-specific or, rather, general changes in olfactory sensitivity and, if the former is the case, to what group of odorants in particular. We carried out a meta-analysis of relevant studies which together used a variety of different odorants, including some found in food, body odor, and some that occur in neither of these. First we tested whether there appears to be an overall effect when all studies are included. Next, we hypothesised that if cyclic changes in olfactory processing are odor-specific and tuned to biologically relevant odors, we should find changes in detection thresholds only for odorants found in body odor, or for those that are perceptually similar to it. In contrast, if threshold patterns are linked to more general fluctuations in odor processing across the cycle, we would not expect changes in relation to any particular odorant group. The results support the view that there is significant cycle-correlated variation. Thresholds were in general significantly lower in the fertile than the non-fertile phases, with effect sizes consistently in this direction. This same conclusion applied to both ‘food’ and ‘musky’ odorants, despite their different evolutionary significance, and to the androgen steroids (androstadienone, androstenone, and androsterone), but could not be applied to phenyl-ethyl alcohol. The results indicate that olfactory sensitivity may be a non-adaptive by-product of the general physiological fluctuations or differences in neural processing experienced across the cycle to a broad spectrum of odorants, rather than being specifically selected for mate choice-related odors.
机译:嗅觉阈值与周期相关的变化(女性在周期中对气味更加敏感)在一定程度上得到了文献的支持,但证据并不完全一致,一些研究没有发现或有混合效应。有人认为,嗅觉阈值的周期性变化可能仅限于与交配环境有关的气味。我们旨在测试当前可用的证据是否指向气味特异性的方向,或者更确切地说,是嗅觉敏感性的总体变化,如果是这种情况,则特别针对什么类型的气味。我们对相关研究进行了荟萃分析,这些研究一起使用了各种不同的增香剂,包括在食物,体臭中发现的一些,以及在这两种气味中均未出现的一些。首先,我们测试了纳入所有研究后是否有总体效果。接下来,我们假设,如果嗅觉处理过程中的周期性变化是特定于气味的,并且已调整为与生物学相关的气味,那么我们应该只针对体味中或与之相似的气味发现检测阈值的变化。相反,如果阈值模式与整个周期中气味处理过程中更普遍的波动相关联,则我们不会期望任何特定气味剂组的变化。结果支持这样的观点,即周期相关的变化很大。通常,可育阶段的阈值显着低于非可育阶段的阈值,并且在此方向上的效果大小一致。尽管具有不同的进化意义,该结论同样适用于“食品”和“麝香”香精,也适用于雄激素类固醇(androstadienone,androstenone和androsterone),但不适用于苯乙醇。结果表明,嗅觉敏感性可能是一般生理性波动或整个循环中经历的神经加工过程中对广谱气味的差异的非适应性副产品,而不是专门针对伴侣选择相关的气味进行选择的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号